An argument that all guns are good guns and the whole nation should be armed

Ban them all molly ivins guns everywhere guns let me start this discussion by pointing out that i am not anti-gun we’d turn into a whole nation of great runners and. Dear varq, you know my stance on guns (summary: a nation is better off if only the military and some policemen are armed as long as crime is generally low i basically argue that gangsters always have the advantage of the aggressor and a an unarmed society is a nicer society. Ok so i dont care if this is a stupid question about the debate on guns for use as security and safety against intruders i can see both sides of the argument. Your personal views on morality have a no bearing on the argument, as all contingencies are covered reply arizona free says they cannot control and enslave us as long as we keep our guns (wolves/armed sheep discussing lunch) state or nation , the entity doing the disarming accepts legal responsibility for protecting the citizenry it.

an argument that all guns are good guns and the whole nation should be armed At a minimum, we should do the same with guns in truth, there is no rational argument for guns in this society this is no longer a frontier nation in which people hunt their own food.

Your whole argument as long as criminals and governments have guns, law-abiding people should have them too is a argument which support that guns show fear and disrespect for life for the criminals have lifes too, and to argue guns should be bought to defend yourself reveals fear. Bad people always will have guns and good people should have the right to protect themselves banning guns only punishes the innocent and leaves them unable to fight back even mahatma ghandi, who helped india gain independence through passive resistance, agreed. Ron l the nra answer for everything is more, more, more, guns and ammunition and it will all work out for the better the ridiculous assertion that the only way to stop a bad person with a gun is a good person with a gun.

These guns are a huge deterrent and that is why criminal politicians like almost all liberals want to take our guns so badly, and that is why they will never get them. The majority falls prey to the delusion, popular in some circles, that ordinary people are too careless and stupid to own guns, and we would be far better off leaving all weapons in the hands of professionals on the government payroll. One thing that we all have in common (i'll bet the farm on) is that whatever our reason to own guns, we all look at our guns as an ability to defend ourselves and others, if necessary while i am on the soapbox: this is the first time i have seen the guns are designed to hurl projectiles argument. Comparing this reality to the red dawn narrative of armed resistance gun advocates offer highlights how little merit the “guns prevent tyranny” hypothesis has the few instances of armed resistance such as the warsaw uprising were quickly annihilated.

The american hunting tradition comes from a time when the united states was an agrarian, subsistence nation where hunting was a profession for some, an auxiliary source of food for some settlers, and also a deterrence to animal predators. The only way to enforce a gun ban is with armed people, so guns are going to be there anyway or you have no effective ban the legally sanctioned armed people are still just people, as flawed as everybody else. And, nra officials blamed the news media for focusing on what they view as the wrong issue — guns — rather than violent video games and the nation's mental health care programs. - should the mere fact that criminals committing crimes with the use of guns infringe the national right of the innocent to possess guns this is a question that arouses everywhere and no matter which way it is viewed the controversy will always go on. Guns of all sizes and description are manufactured and sold in this country in remarkable numbers, far more than can be legally absorbed in our already gun-saturated land, so thousands of them.

Then there is the whole constitution thing which guarantees the citizens of this country the right to be armed, anybody who thinks otherwise should be stripped of their citizenship and sent to north korea to witness first hand how helpless an unarmed population can become. After all, that’s the definition of a criminal: someone who doesn’t obey a law keeping guns out of criminal’s hands because they’ve been banned will be just as successful as our ban on. In the wake of the arizona tragedy last week, need to know updates its story about gun rights activists and examines the current state of gun control laws in the us. Guns do not kill people people armed with guns kill people and people armed with assault rifles have the capability of killing a whole bunch of people in a matter of minutes.

An argument that all guns are good guns and the whole nation should be armed

Guns are a quick and easy way for men, young and old, to reaffirm their masculinity this poses a clear danger to the women that surround them this poses a clear danger to the women that surround. Would college campuses be safer if students could carry guns when criminals attack on campus, would armed students make the situation better or worse. As the grynszpan case illustrates, jews in france had easy access to guns, and a fat lot of good that did in preventing the nazi invasion of that nation and the deportation of many jews from french territory.

  • All situations where there are firearms involved are tended to by the branch and they are suitably equipped that particular system seems to work fine as it is i would stipulate however that i believe there may be a requirement for tougher law with regard to possession which may deter some criminals from carrying guns.
  • Two other areas of crime—violent crime and property crime—are analyzed by the violence policy center, and cast serious doubt on the argument that guns are used regularly in self-defense between 2007 and 2011, only 08 percent of violent crimes involved the intended victim using a firearm in self-defense.
  • The trace is an independent, nonprofit news organization dedicated to expanding coverage of guns in the united states we believe that our country’s epidemic rates of firearm-related violence are coupled with a second problem: a shortage of information about the issue at large.

The national rifle association and its allies have their post-shooting routine down cold they wait a day or two and then respond with a blistering array of attacks against gun-safety advocates. Those who want guns -- whether for target shooting, hunting or potting rattlesnakes (get a hoe) -- should be subject to the same restrictions placed on gun owners in england – a nation in which liberty has survived nicely without an armed populace. The argument for armed citizenry is nonsense it's arms dealers making money off the death and paranoia of weak minded people guns have now become financial assets as the demand inflates the price better than property. People are talking a lot these days about guns chances are, you have strong opinions one way or the other about whether guns are good or bad and who should have them and who shouldn’t.

an argument that all guns are good guns and the whole nation should be armed At a minimum, we should do the same with guns in truth, there is no rational argument for guns in this society this is no longer a frontier nation in which people hunt their own food. an argument that all guns are good guns and the whole nation should be armed At a minimum, we should do the same with guns in truth, there is no rational argument for guns in this society this is no longer a frontier nation in which people hunt their own food. an argument that all guns are good guns and the whole nation should be armed At a minimum, we should do the same with guns in truth, there is no rational argument for guns in this society this is no longer a frontier nation in which people hunt their own food.
An argument that all guns are good guns and the whole nation should be armed
Rated 3/5 based on 49 review

2018.